Bayesian Networks and GIS-based analysis for flood risk assessment in agriculture during heavy rainfall events

Paul Gräfe; Angela Blanco-Vogt; Franz-Josef Behr

doi:10.64866/j.ijdscr.2025.10002

Authors

Paul Gräfe Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany Author
Angela Blanco-Vogt Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3650-9594
Franz-Josef Behr Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64866/j.ijdscr.2025.10002

Keywords:

Flood risk assessment, Bayesian Networks, GIS analysis, Heavy rainfall events, Agricultural risk modeling, Geospatial data, Scenario analysis, Disaster risk management, Extreme weather events, Machine learning in hydrology, Climate change adaptation

Abstract

The increasing frequency and intensity of heavy rainfall events due to climate change pose a growing risk to agriculture, and its prediction remains a substantial challenge for the scientific community. Leveraging the availability of high-quality open geospatial data provided by governmental institutions and existing probabilistic risk models, this study proposes a systematic approach for analyzing the risks associated with heavy rainfall events in agriculture. The objective is to develop and test a methodology that integrates open geospatial data, considers uncertainties, and conducts scenario analyses based on the historical heavy rainfall event of June 2, 2024, in the Rems-Murr district, Germany. Initially, variables such as Rainfall Intensity, Temperature, Land Use (from land use maps), Soil Type, Soil Moisture, Slope, Elevation, and River Discharge—obtained from official institutions—along with variables like Proximity to River, Road Density, and Proximity to Forest (derived from GIS analysis), were conceptually integrated into a Bayesian Network (BN). This integration was based on theoretical foundations and quantified using conditional probability distributions (CPD). The results demonstrate that the methodology combining BN and GIS analyses, along with scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, optimization, and model validation, was successfully applied to the wider area of the Rems-Murr district. When tested on the heavy rainfall event of June 2, 2024, in the study area of Rudersberg, it provided qualitatively convincing results for flood risk assessment in agriculture. Validation in Rudersberg yielded a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 23%. The methodology was also successfully applied across regions in Miedelsbach, where validation with official data collected by the county resulted in an RMSE of 30%. These findings indicate that the methodology is applicable not only within the study area but also across different regions. It is recommended to improve the model by incorporating additional variables such as surface parameters, roughness values, and drainage systems to improve accuracy. Furthermore, integrating meteorological forecasts could provide a basis for forward-looking risk predictions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Paul Gräfe, Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany

Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany
Angela Blanco-Vogt, Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany

Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany
Franz-Josef Behr, Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany

Professor, Faculty of Surveying, Mathematics and Informatics, Stuttgart University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany

References

Abebe, Y., Kabir, G., & Tesfamariam, S. (2018). Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and Bayesian Belief Network model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1629–1641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.066

Achleitner, S., Huber, A., Lumassegger, S., Kohl, B., Spira, Y., & Weingraber, F. (2020). Pilotstudie Oberösterreich: Modellierung von Starkregenoberflächenabfluss / Hangwasser (Leitfaden). Association of European Border Regions. https://rainman-toolbox.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/AU_Leitfaden.pdf

Adam, C., Gläßer, W., & Hölting, B. (Eds.). (2000). Hydrogeologisches Wörterbuch. Thieme, Stuttgart. https://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=20939&ufzPublicationIdentifier=6960

U.S. Department of Agriculture (NRCS). (1986). Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (Technical Release 55, TR-55, Revised June 1986). https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1421/ML14219A437.pdf

Ankan, A., & Panda, A. (2015). pgmpy: Probabilistic Graphical Models using Python. Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.25080/majora-7b98e3ed-001

Assmann, A. (2023). Starkregen und Hochwasser in kleinen Einzugsgebieten – Auswirkungen. In Porth, M., Schüttrumpf, H., & Ostermann, U. (Eds.), Wasser, Energie und Umwelt: Aktuelle Beiträge aus der Zeitschrift Wasser und Abfall III (pp. 123–127). Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42657-6_13

Aven, T. (2015). Risk Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.de/books/about/Risk_Analysis.html?id=41V_BwAAQBAJ

Baden-Württemberg Regierungspräsidien. (2024). Gemeinsam gegen die Folgen des Unwetters: Landeshilfe aktiviert / rund 19 Millionen Euro zusätzliche Hilfe für den Stuttgarter Regierungsbezirk. https://rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/rps/wir/abteilungen/pressemitteilungen-und-aktuelle-meldungen/artikel/hochwasser-landeshilfe-aktiviert-19-millionen-euro-zusaetzliche-hilfe-fuer-den-stuttgarter-regierungsbezirk/

Becker, P., Becker, A., Dalelane, C., Deutschländer, T., Junghänel, T., & Walter, A. (2016). Die Entwicklung von Starkniederschlägen in Deutschland: Plädoyer für eine differenzierte Betrachtung. Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienstes, 245. https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/besondereereignisse/niederschlag/20160719_entwicklung_starkniederschlag_deutschland.pdf

Bill, R. (2010). Grundlagen der Geo-Informationssysteme. Wichmann.

Borga, M., Boscolo, P., Zanon, F., & Sangati, M. (2007). Hydrometeorological analysis of the 29 August 2003 flash flood in the Eastern Italian Alps. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8, 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm593.1

Chai, T., & Draxler, R.R. (2014). Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geoscientific Model Development, 7, 1247–1250. https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/7/1247/2014/

Climate-Data.org. (2025). Klimadaten für Rudersberg, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland. https://de.climate-data.org/europa/deutschland/baden-wuerttemberg/rudersberg-156016/

Cooper, G.F., & Herskovits, E. (1992). A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning, 9, 309–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00994110

CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters). (2025). EM-DAT: The International Disaster Database. https://public.emdat.be/data

Dinkelbach, W. (1969). Sensitivitätsanalysen und parametrische Programmierung. In Ökonometrie und Unternehmensforschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88169-5

DWD. (2024). Starkregen: Definition und Klassifikation. https://www.dwd.de/DE/service/lexikon/begriffe/S/Starkregen.html

Fatichi, S., Vivoni, E., Ogden, F., Ivanov, V., Mirus, B., Gochis, D., Downer, C., Camporese, M., Davison, J., Ebel, B., Jones, N., Kim, J., Mascaro, G., Niswonger, R., Restrepo, P., Rigon, R., Shen, C., Sulis, M., & Tarboton, D. (2016). An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology. Journal of Hydrology, 537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026

Furlan, E., Slanzi, D., Torresan, S., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2020). Multi-scenario analysis in the Adriatic Sea: A GIS-based Bayesian Network to support maritime spatial planning. Science of the Total Environment, 703, 134972. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969719349642

Harris, R., Furlan, E., Pham, H.V., Torresan, S., Mysiak, J., & Critto, A. (2022). A Bayesian network approach for multi-sectoral flood damage assessment and multi-scenario analysis. Climate Risk Management, 35, 100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100410

Hrachowitz, M., & Clark, M.P. (2017). HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 3953–3973. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/21/3953/2017/

Huang, S., Wang, H., Xu, Y., She, J., & Huang, J. (2021). Key disaster-causing factor chains on urban flood risk based on Bayesian Network. Land, 10, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020210

Korb, K.B., & Nicholson, A.E. (2010). Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. CRC Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10391

Koski, T., & Noble, J. (2011). Bayesian Networks: An Introduction. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.de/books?id=aoBzNiDPfQsC

Kragt, M.E. (2009). A beginner’s guide to Bayesian Network modelling for integrated catchment management. Landscape Logic. https://www.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/588467/TR_9_BNs_for_Integrated_Catchment_Management.pdf

Kreibich, H., Schröter, K., Shprits, Y., Bedford, J., & Tilmann, F. (2018). Maschinelles Lernen verbessert Gefährdungs- und Risikonalysen von Naturgefahren. System Erde, 8, 10–17. https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_3539918

Lehmann, J., Coumou, D., & Frieler, K. (2015). Increased record-breaking precipitation events under global warming. Climatic Change, 132, 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1434-y

LGLN (Landesamt für Geoinformation und Landesvermessung Niedersachsen). (2025). NAS. https://www.lgln.niedersachsen.de/startseite/wir_uber_uns/hilfe_support/lgln_lexikon/n/nas-190332.html

Li, G., Wu, X., Han, J.-C., Li, B., Huang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Flood risk assessment by using an interpretative structural modeling-based Bayesian Network approach (ISM-BN): An urban-level analysis of Shenzhen, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117040. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722026135

Li, Y., Guan, K., Schnitkey, G.D., DeLucia, E., & Peng, B. (2019). Excessive rainfall leads to maize yield loss of a comparable magnitude to extreme drought in the United States. Global Change Biology, 25, 2325–2337. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14628

Lu, Y., Zhai, G., & Zhou, S. (2024). An integrated Bayesian Networks and Geographic Information System (BNs-GIS) approach for flood disaster risk assessment: A case study of Yinchuan, China. Ecological Indicators, 166, 112322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112322

Merz, R. (2008). Einflussfaktoren auf die Form der Hochwasserwahrscheinlichkeitskurve. In Hochwasser, Wassermangel, Gewässerverschmutzung – Problemlösung mit modernen hydrologischen Methoden (pp. 113–106). Leibniz Universität Hannover, DWA. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11970/112870

Muthiah, K., Arunya, K.G., Sridhar, V., & Patakamuri, S.K. (2025). Heavy rainfall impact on agriculture: Crop risk assessment with farmer participation in the Paravanar coastal river basin. Water, 17. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/17/5/658

Niu, H., Sun, W., Huai, B., Wang, Y., Chen, R., Han, C., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., & Wang, L. (2024). Causes of increased compound temperature and precipitation extreme events in the arid region of Northwest China from 1961 to 2100. Remote Sensing, 16, 3111. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173111

Pearl, J. (2014). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Elsevier. https://books.google.de/books?id=mn2jBQAAQBAJ

Rana, I.A., & Routray, J.K. (2017). Integrated methodology for flood risk assessment and application in urban communities of Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 91, 239–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3124-8

Spektrum.de. (2004). Lexikon der Geographie: Regenintensität. https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/geographie/regenintensitaet/6508

Sperotto, A., Molina, J.-L., Torresan, S., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2017). Reviewing Bayesian Networks potentials for climate change impacts assessment and management: A multi-risk perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 202, 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.044

Weigell, P. (2023). Data coverage, richness, and quality of OpenStreetMap for special interest tags: Wayside crosses – a case study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04752

Wilke, S. (2024). Trends der Niederschlagshöhe. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/klima/trends-der-niederschlagshoehe

Wu, Z., Shen, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, M. (2019). Assessing urban flood disaster risk using Bayesian Network model and GIS applications. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk, 10, 2163–2184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1685010

Zhang, P., Sun, W., Xiao, P., Yao, W., & Liu, G. (2022). Driving factors of heavy rainfall causing flash floods in the middle reaches of the Yellow River: A case study in the Wuding River Basin, China. Sustainability, 14, 8004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su